Skip to content 
Under FinCEN Notice 2020-2, a foreign account holding only virtual currency is not currently defined as a reportable FBAR account. Add fiat balances, tokenized securities, or any other reportable asset, and the account becomes reportable under the existing rules. FinCEN has said it intends to amend the regulations to change this, so this page carries an annual review marker: the rule described here is re-verified at every dated update, and Form 8938 and income tax reporting run on their own tracks either way.
The one notice carrying the whole answer
The entire current FBAR position for crypto rests on a single document. FinCEN Notice 2020-2 says three things, and saying them accurately matters. First, the FBAR regulations do not currently define a foreign account holding virtual currency as a reportable account. Second, a crypto-only foreign account is therefore not reportable, unless the account holds other reportable assets besides the virtual currency. Third, FinCEN intends to propose amending the rules to make virtual currency a reportable account type.
That third sentence is why nothing in this article gets to be permanent. The notice announced its own replacement, and the amendment it promised has still not been finalized, which leaves filers standing on a clear rule with a stated expiration and no date on it.
The question arrives in three forms:
“My crypto is on a foreign exchange. Does that go on the FBAR?”
“I keep some USD on the exchange too. Does that change anything?”
“If crypto isn’t reportable, is my money invisible?”
Short answers: not currently, if the account is crypto-only. Yes, quite possibly everything. And no, not remotely, which is where Form 8938 and the tax return enter.
Four kinds of custody, four different analyses
| Custodial foreign exchange | Self-custody wallet | DeFi protocol | Crypto payment account | |
| What you hold | An account with a platform that holds the keys for you | The keys themselves, with no institution behind them | A position with a protocol, usually no legal person holding for you | A balance with a payment platform that may touch fiat rails |
| FBAR today | Crypto-only: not currently reportable under the Notice; add fiat or other reportable assets and the answer changes | Generally outside the account definition | Generally no account in the definition’s sense; facts vary by protocol | Function test: fiat legs often make it an account |
| Measurement | $10,000 aggregate applies the moment the account holds reportable assets | No account, no maximum value | Requires review, position by position | Highest balance, fiat legs included |
| Form 8938 | The exchange account is often analyzed as a foreign financial account | Directly held tokens: positions vary; often outside | Positions vary widely; no clear guidance either way | Often yes, when the platform is a foreign financial institution |
| Annual review | Required: a proposed rule would move this line | Required | Required | Required |
The numbers that frame it
- 1 notice: the entire current FBAR answer for crypto-only foreign accounts rests on it.
- 0: final regulations so far. The amendment the notice announced remains a stated intention.
- $10,000: the aggregate trigger that activates the moment one reportable asset sits in the account.
- 2: reporting systems that can disagree about the same exchange account: the FBAR and Form 8938.
- 100%: of the income is taxable either way. Nothing on this page touches the tax.
What changes the answer inside a custodial account
The notice’s exception does the real work in practice. The moment a foreign exchange account holds reportable assets besides virtual currency, it is a reportable account under the existing rules, and the crypto question becomes moot for that account.
Fiat balances are the everyday trigger: the dollars or euros parked between trades. Tokenized securities push the same direction, because a security wrapped in a token is still hard to call only virtual currency.
Stablecoins are the honest gray zone. Whether a dollar-pegged token answers like crypto or like the dollar it mirrors is genuinely unsettled, and assuming either way without a review is how this category generates repairs.
One practical consequence follows: the answer can change mid-year. An account that was crypto-only in March and held fiat for one week in August was a reportable account for that year, measured at its highest value.
Form 8938 runs its own race
Nothing in the FinCEN notice touches the tax side. Under the Form 8938 instructions, an account maintained at a foreign financial institution is a specified foreign financial asset, and a custodial foreign exchange is often analyzed exactly that way, whatever the account holds.
Self-custody sits differently: with no institution and no account, positions vary on whether directly held tokens belong on the statement at all, and no clear guidance settles it in either direction.
The income tax layer has no gray at all. Every disposition is taxable, the digital asset question on the return is answered under penalties of perjury, and no FBAR rule, current or future, has ever excused a dollar of it.
Conservative filing, named honestly
Plenty of taxpayers file FBARs for crypto-only foreign exchange accounts anyway, and the reasoning is not silly: the rule has announced its own change, the penalty asymmetry is brutal, and disclosure costs a form.
Name it correctly, though: that is a practice choice, not settled law. Nobody is currently required to report a crypto-only foreign account, and any adviser presenting conservative filing as the rule is describing their risk preference, not the regulation. The right conversation weighs your facts, your platforms, and your tolerance, then decides on purpose.
The annual review marker on this page
This article carries an explicit annual review marker, and here is what it means. The current rule is a notice plus an unfinalized proposal, which is the least stable kind of law there is. The dated byline above reflects the last verification, and the analysis on this page is re-checked against FinCEN’s rulemaking at every update.
If you are reading this while planning a filing, the marker is your instruction too: confirm the proposal’s status for your filing year before relying on the crypto-only exception, because the year it finalizes, this page’s headline answer flips.
Common mistakes with foreign crypto accounts
- Reading the notice as permanent, when it announced its own replacement.
- Missing the fiat balance that quietly converted the account into a reportable one.
- Assuming stablecoins answer like fiat, or like crypto, without a review.
- Skipping Form 8938 because the FBAR answer was no.
- Believing crypto avoids foreign reporting entirely. The tax return never got that memo.
- Copying one platform’s answer onto another. Custody structure decides, platform by platform.
FAQ
Structure first, then the filings
The account framework underneath all of this, categories, thresholds, and the aggregate test, lives in our advanced FBAR reporting guide, and the penalty stakes on a wrong answer are covered in FBAR penalties after Bittner. The neighboring edge cases, gambling platforms and offshore payment accounts, get their own decision framework in our crypto, gambling, and payment accounts guide.
At Ed Parsons CPA, crypto files start with the custody map and end with both systems answered on purpose. The Form 8938 CPA FATCA Filing service carries the asset statement side, where most of the current obligations actually live, and the FinCEN Form 114 FBAR CPA Filing service covers the accounts that are reportable today and the conservative filings chosen deliberately.
